Ben Roethlisberger Will Accept Disciplinary Action If Not "Too Harsh"

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger will accept disciplinary action by the NFL or the Steelers without fighting the penalty if he and his advisers do not consider the discipline "too harsh," a source familiar with the situation said Monday. That disciplinary action perhaps could be announced in the coming days. The source close to the deliberations said he believes an announcement could be made Wednesday.

Source: Washington Post

 

he should appeal anything over 4 games

 

Maybe his vic was raped too hard. Get this jerk out of football. He is a rapist and should be doing time.

 

No doubt, is this guy freaking kidding??

 

Yup, agreed since this is Big Ben's first meeting with Roger Goodell.

 

This hecker shouldn't make a peep since whatever Goodell hands out it won't include jailtime.

 

Screw you. Your a freaking pr**k, you take what ever the punishment is regardless of how "unfair" it is. Get the freaking happy off the field Goodell...out of football period.

 

This

 

:icon_cool:

:icon_confused: If he actually said that,...he is pretty stupid.

 

Why go overboard? He hasn't committed a crime like some other players in the league...lol...appeal over 4 Ben...you'll win. Winners always win!

 

^

 

Screw that, he should be ecstatic for anything less than jail time.

 

How ironic it would be for him to tell Goodell "No, this is not ok."

 

^ Love it.

 

Slap on the wrist and flag football for another QB.

 

could you imagine if you got thrown in jail just because you got accused of sexual assault?

he didnt get charged with anything. and i am sure he was in the "wrong" which is very vague but i guarantee there was no rape involved...no one really ever said there was. someone says sexual assault and everyone who doesnt like him (because, yes he is a douchebag) just starts calling him a rapist

 

by 'sexual assult' he could have grabbed her titties

everyone shouldnt assume he raped the snitch

 

It clearly says in the report that he had s*x with her despite her protestations...how the heck is that not rape? I realize that that is far from hard evidence that he actually raped her (which is why this case went nowhere, it's all he said she said), but someone (the alleged victim) CLEARLY claims she was raped.

 

AND she is the second one to do so

 

Never been charged, basically, never happened...

No DNA evidence...sorry.

:Gosteelers: