Ravens Trade For Center A.Q. Shipley

Discussion in 'Baltimore Ravens' started by Sweets, May 9, 2013.

  1. Sweets

    Sweets All-Pro

    Looking to add some competition for Gino Gradkowski and more versatility along the offensive line, the Ravens agreed to send a conditional 2014 draft pick today to the Indianapolis Colts for center A.Q. Shipley, Jeff Zrebiec of the Baltimore Sun reports.

    The trade will become official when Shipley passes a physical.

    Shipley, a seventh-round pick out of Penn State by the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2009, started five games at center for Indianapolis last season and saw action in 14 total games, at 6 feet 1 and 309 pounds, Shipley can also play guard.

    He was expendable because the Colts have veteran starting center Samson Satele returning, along with 2012 fourth-round pick Khaled Holmes.

    With the Ravens, Shipley is expected to compete with Gradkowski for the starting center spot, which became open when Matt Birk retired.

    Source: The Redzone
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2013
  2. 86WARD

    86WARD -

    I can only HOPE that Shipley wins that battle!!!
     
  3. CStevenson13

    CStevenson13 1st Stringer

    I like it, solid backup for Gino
     
  4. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    He is NOT solid lol
     
  5. CStevenson13

    CStevenson13 1st Stringer

    Did you watch him last season?
     
  6. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    I sure did and he was BAD. If they think they are better off with samson satele, that speaks a lot about how horrible Shipley is with his little baby t-rex arms.

    *I did see him last year, but 72% of my opinion is formed on his stint with the steelers and the waste of a draft pick
     
  7. CStevenson13

    CStevenson13 1st Stringer

    He was actually pretty solid last year, especially later, check that last Houston game out. Colts fans are upset and felt like beside better guards they were better off with him over Satele but they did just draft Holmes. PFF graded him out pretty well as well. I think your 2009 slight is clouding your 2013 opinion lol.
     
  8. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    I said a 72% cloud lol

    I hate PFF, its just not a sport you can break down that way
     
  9. CStevenson13

    CStevenson13 1st Stringer

    I have a buddy over there that also writes for the site i write for, i partially agree with you, they do good work over there, they keep things in proper prospective i think. However i think some things you cant quantify with advanced stats, etc. I've always went with the good ole eye ball test first before anything.
     
  10. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    I get it, i think its interesting for sure and they do a good job trying to sabermetric football statisitics, i just dont think it works like that with football but they arent the worst thing to cite, some people take it too much to heart though and some of their stats are pretty odd
     
  11. CStevenson13

    CStevenson13 1st Stringer

    Yea feel you, it is a bit annoying when a player is brought up and the first thing a guy says is PFF rates him...or in basketball the guys has a per of....How bout just look at the guy and tell me if he sucks or not!? lol
     
  12. Jihad Joe

    Jihad Joe Life to Infidels

    Football Outsiders is 100X better then PFF

    Sent from my HTC Vivid
     
  13. CStevenson13

    CStevenson13 1st Stringer

    Been meaning to look more into them, i've agreed with the little bit ive seen from them.
     
  14. Jihad Joe

    Jihad Joe Life to Infidels

    FO, especially listings arent as "out there" as PFF. Thats one of the reasons why PFF is popular because there data is more available