If you're limiting your assessment to those stats, then you're right. But if you're saying that he is the better of the two QB's overall, then whoa. Hypothetically if you're the GM of an expansion franchise and you get your pick between them, who's your choice?
Why don't you go sit down somewhere and think about who you want as the next HC of the Whiners? Because U of Michigan head honchos are already in SF waiting to talk to Harbaugh after tomorrow's game.
In those 3 statistical areas that I mentioned earlier, Romo IS better than Rodgers. Is he the best QB in the NFL? Maybe not, but I think he deserves to be in the conversation. League MVP? Same answer. And, if any of you disagree with me, I have some words of advice for you: Watch the damned game!!!
Rodgers has more yards, more TDs, less INTs and more points than the Cowboys...3 statistical categories that trump the three that you mentioned IMO. Therefore Rodgers is a better QB and if you watch the "damn game," you too will see the same.
Romo is a supporting character. Rodgers is the lead dog. If we asked Romo to do this year what GB asks Rodgers to do Romo's rating would drop a good 20 points and we would win 8 games again f**k**ing fanboys, In no universe is Romo better then Rodgers