Am I too thin at WR?

Discussion in 'Fantasy Football Advice' started by Kingdahnk911, Sep 15, 2015.

  1. Kingdahnk911

    Kingdahnk911 EOT Feb 18th, 2016 Premium Member

    With TY going down, do you think I am too thin at WR? feeling good about my RBs, and have put in waiver claims that would drop Brian Quick and add Terrance Williams or Donte Moncrief. I am hoping that will give me more immediate value.

    12 Teams/Standard Scoring + 0.5PPR
    QB - T. Romo
    RB - E. Lacy, J. Forsett, L. Blount, T. Gurley, T. Coleman
    WR - TY Hilton, E. Decker, M. Wallace, V. Cruz, B. Quick
    TE – T. Kelce

    Am I a fool for holding on to Cruz, instead of taking more immediate value? Do you think I should consider trading Kelce/Forsett/Blount for a more solid WR, or should I stay the course and hope Coleman continues to get 20 touches/game and work he or Blount into my flex?

    Thanks guys. Appreciate the help.
     
  2. Samson

    Samson Lifetime Member Premium Member

    I would drop Quick before Cruz personally. Cruz will benifit from the double team ODB gets and let's not forget his talent.

    Blount and Forsett you would end up selling low right now and I don't think that is a soul move.

    Kelce can likely of set your WR issue I wouldn't trade him away.

    This is all dependent on what you would be offered.

    Who is on your wire?
     
  3. Kingdahnk911

    Kingdahnk911 EOT Feb 18th, 2016 Premium Member

    Thanks Samson. The quick responses by everyone are def appreciated. Here are the top 50 FLX . I agree on dropping Quick before Cruz, and appreciate your advice on not moving on the bearish Blount and Forsett.

    Assuming you think I should still be moving Quick for T WIlliams or D Moncrief, is there anyone you see here that may be worth exchanging for Cruz or Gurley? I'm not totally committed to moving those two guys, and think I may be better served revisiting that question next week (or wk3).
    Screenshot 2015-09-15 at 7.44.03 PM.png Screenshot 2015-09-15 at 7.44.23 PM.png Screenshot 2015-09-15 at 7.47.11 PM.png Screenshot 2015-09-15 at 7.47.32 PM.png
     
  4. Samson

    Samson Lifetime Member Premium Member

    IMO Moncrief will be dependent TY being out which works for you.

    Williams will have vaule for 4-6 till after Dez gets back and he will still benifit from the double coverage DEZ gets. Plus he will likely get more of connection with Romo in the coming weeks.

    B.Coleman NO is also a good add.

    I like James Jones too can't ignore Rodgers WR, but they spread the rock in GB.

    Leave Gurley alone eventually he will be in the offense maybe slow start, but it will be his backfield you drafted him keep him. When Gurley comes back you can move RB to bolster WR.

    I would trade a RB to upgrade WR, but just don't sell low.
     
  5. Kurt

    Kurt That Server Guy Staff Member Fantasy Guru

    CoLEMAN - ADD NOW - No question - don't look back - he'll put up wr/2 numbers at worse.

    Moncrief is a good pick up but will be up/down esp once ty comes back -

    So add Coleman!! B. Quick is my cut but it's up to you..
     
  6. Kingdahnk911

    Kingdahnk911 EOT Feb 18th, 2016 Premium Member

    Thanks Kurt. You and Samson have been a big help. Kurt is always money. I have three transactions pending...all drop Quick...1) coleman 2)Williams 3)moncrief

    Thanks again boys
     
  7. Kingdahnk911

    Kingdahnk911 EOT Feb 18th, 2016 Premium Member

    I was able to grab Coleman. Enjoyed Stefan's sleeper article as well...
    http://fantasyknuckleheads.com/sleeper-alert-saints-wr-brandon-coleman/

    Someone in this league dropped Marques Colston for Carrson Palmer. Colston & Coleman each had 7 targets week 1. Do you think i should put a claim in exchanging Colston for Coleman, or do you think Coleman has too much upside redzone potential?

    Thanks guys
     
  8. Kurt

    Kurt That Server Guy Staff Member Fantasy Guru


    yes @bcole is a Saints fan and he did good with that piece.

    Keep Colston on the bench - Coleman should over take him if he can avoid drops. Time will tell...