Michael Crabtree = J.J. Stokes?

Discussion in 'San Francisco 49ers' started by DoubleC, Aug 13, 2009.

  1. DoubleC

    DoubleC i'm ready now...

    Holy crap! Now I'm scared. :gasp:
     
  2. Crowned

    Crowned Doesn't give a shit.

  3. Sweets

    Sweets All-Pro

    stop reading ESPN, that alone should scare anyone.
     
  4. Jihad Joe

    Jihad Joe Life to Infidels

    Oxlong's has been comparing him to Stokes since before the combine
     
  5. mike oxlong

    mike oxlong The Voice Of Reason

    that's right, I have been calling him jj stokes 2. lol stokes had some decent seasons, but was never the superstar he was billed to be.
     
  6. pctrips

    pctrips Pro Bowler

    Everyone loved JJ Stokes because of his size. Crabtree can actually play.
     
  7. Platoon 86

    Platoon 86 Loony

    His name was so fun to say too. :p JJ Stokes!
     
  8. mike oxlong

    mike oxlong The Voice Of Reason

    JJ Stokes - huge college producer, size, hands, lack of speed. Was a BEAST coming out of school. The likenesses are uncanny, the only real difference is that stokes was 1-2 inches taller.
     
  9. hermhater

    hermhater Guest

    :icon_lol:
     
  10. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    i think crabtree is more comparable to marshall than stokes to be honest.

    hes a little shorter but built pretty much the same...both run in the 4.5-4.6 range, both got good hands and good leaping ability and neither are any fun to tackle

    stokes was a little before my time though (when he was drafted anyway)
     
  11. hermhater

    hermhater Guest

    Was it about contracts?
     
  12. mike oxlong

    mike oxlong The Voice Of Reason

    dude, marshall is 6-4 230 and crabtree is 6-1 215, he is in no way comparable to marshall. lol Stokes had a couple inches on crabtree, but they were basically the same weight. They both had "great" hands, not so much speed, insane scorers in college. Stokes was a top 10 pick by the niners too, but that part is just a nice coincidence.
     
  13. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    ok but proportionally 6-4 230 and 6-1 215 are about the same....and both of them are "slow" for WRs....im just saying the comparison is there skill wise
     
  14. hermhater

    hermhater Guest

    3 inches is a world of difference dude...
     
  15. mj1987us26

    mj1987us26 Super

    That's what she said BAAAZING!!
     
  16. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    ok im not comparing their size...its the skill set, the ability to leap, their speed, their hands.

    its no use lol
     
  17. hermhater

    hermhater Guest

    :icon_lol:
     
  18. mike oxlong

    mike oxlong The Voice Of Reason

    yeah but stokes is comparable in all that and size, lol
     
  19. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    yeah but stokes is a little before my time (when he was drafted at least) this is what i have to work with


    damnit


    lol
     
  20. Jihad Joe

    Jihad Joe Life to Infidels

    Crabtree is no where near the freak Marshal is Marshal is a monster after the catch because he is 230 LBS. Crabtree was a monster because he got alot of 1 on 1's in college