Deadline Passes And No Teams Try To Sign Steelers WR Mike Wallace

Discussion in 'Pittsburgh Steelers' started by SRW, Apr 20, 2012.

  1. SRW

    SRW Ex-World's Worst Site Admin

    No team signed restricted free-agent Mike Wallace by the deadline, according to ESPN's Andrew Brandt, so he'll remain with the Steelers this season. The Steelers' front office took a risk by not putting the franchise tag on Wallace and won $7 million with that gamble. If you want to be specific, the Steelers netted $6.8 million by putting a first-round tender on Wallace ($2.7 million) instead of the tag ($9.5 million). He has until June 15 to sign it before the Steelers can get cut the tender to $577,500 -- a loss of $2.1 million.

    Source: ESPN.com
     
  2. buffalobillsfan1

    buffalobillsfan1 2nd String

    Not surprising.
     
  3. TheSnowman

    TheSnowman #1 Trap Star

    Well he still says he's not gonna sign it last I heard, so it's not in the bag yet really
     
  4. Crowned

    Crowned Doesn't give a shit.

    He can skip all camps and all without punishment, but he will have to sign it when he starts losing money due to fines. Not many players hold out once they start getting money taken away.
     
  5. bigsexyy81

    bigsexyy81 Muffin Top

    Ya, no way he'll throw away part of that $2.7 mil.
     
  6. 86WARD

    86WARD -

    If he doesn't sign it by mid-June, he loses about $2.2 million as the Steelers can lower the tender to $577500...
     
  7. CaptainStubing

    CaptainStubing Gave her a Dirty Sanchez

    i must admit i'm a little surprised no one would give a 1st rounder for wallace ............. half the teams will whiff on their 1st round picks next week ........... why not get the sure thing?
     
  8. mj1987us26

    mj1987us26 Super

    Must be getting a lot of negative marks from those teams.
     
  9. TheSnowman

    TheSnowman #1 Trap Star

    Money, I can't say I think he's versatile enough to be one of the highest paid WRs out there.. He's good, but not elite in my opinion. Worth a pick, yes, worth a big deal, quite possibly. But for both I'd want a little more bang for my buck, but that's just my opinion. I'll be the first to point out that most of what I've watched of him has been against the Browns, who have never matched up well against his speed.
     
  10. 86WARD

    86WARD -

    Wallace is better than Blackmon or Floyd...both of which could be selected in Round One...

    I'm also not sold that he's asking for a ridiculous amount of money...I think that's all media...we haven't heard anything from Wallace other than a tweet that said not to believe everything you hear.
     
  11. bigsexyy81

    bigsexyy81 Muffin Top

    He MAY be better.
     
  12. 86WARD

    86WARD -

    I'm talking about right now...and I probably should've said the "better pick" since you know exactly what he is and it's not like he's old.
     
  13. bigsexyy81

    bigsexyy81 Muffin Top

    I kinda figured that's what you meant.