One of my buddies is a head waiter at an upscale restaurant in Cleveland. He says that Haden is there a lot and almost always has small conversations with him. He said Haden likes to give him crap about being a 49ers fan, jokingly. And he always tips real well. I voted for Peterson though.
Sorry to be an anti-Homer, but Peterson is delusional if he thinks given the exact same type of schemes that he is better at keeping a one-on-one opponent out of the end zone than Petersen. Sherman's in-you-face like glue abilities set him apart and why when comparing TD's allowed that Sherman reigns supreme. Sometimes Peterson plays the part of a quasi-FS and covers an area at CB vs. the up at the line one-on-one match-ups against the opponents best WR. For being that "bad" he's still No. 2 in my book and better than Haden (just makes less money). But, add Peterson's punt returns production and I'll take him over Sherman as the best all-around player who happens to play CB as his primary position.
Sherman is a more effective CB. Petterson is a better CB. If they switched teams and schemes, Sherman would be top 20
