A win-win proposition for 49ers, Raiders?

Discussion in 'NFL General Discussion' started by indysteve1563, May 29, 2007.

  1. indysteve1563

    indysteve1563 Guest

    So far it sounds like a good idea. Al Davis is smart enough to know that co-existing at 1 stadium is cost-efficient. If it can work for the Jets and Giants, then there's no reason it cannot work for the 49ers and Raiders.
     
    indysteve1563, May 29, 2007
    #1
  2. cashtool

    cashtool Silly Goose

    Let's just hope it isn't a hole like the meadowlands though.
     
    cashtool, May 29, 2007
    #2
  3. RaiderHater

    RaiderHater Guest

    Screw That!!!!
     
    RaiderHater, May 31, 2007
    #3
  4. nastynate184

    nastynate184 Fuck Michigan

    i agree with the heck that statement
     
    nastynate184, May 31, 2007
    #4
  5. linz_renee

    linz_renee Well-Known

    cruel joke, perhaps?
     
    linz_renee, May 31, 2007
    #5
  6. Jimmy's Dignity

    Jimmy's Dignity Wackbagger Extraordinare

    I assume they'd still be the "Oakland" Raiders, even if they share a stadium up in Santa Clara with the 9ers? [smilie=MISC02.gif]
     
    Jimmy's Dignity, May 31, 2007
    #6
  7. Buffgrandpa

    Buffgrandpa Resident Pervert

    Hey, maybe that way you could at least have one good team playing there every other weekend....Ok, well maybe not... but the odds are better. :)
     
    Buffgrandpa, May 31, 2007
    #7
  8. DawkinsINT

    DawkinsINT Tebow free since 9/5/2015.

    Santa Clara 49ers and Santa Clara Raiders.
     
    DawkinsINT, May 31, 2007
    #8
  9. Walnuts

    Walnuts All-Pro

    DOWN in Santa Clara. Would they still be the SF 49ers?

    Not gonna happen, Al Davis and John York in a buisness venture together? Ha. Plus I don't want dirtbag Raiders fans trashing our stadium like they have done in Oakland.
     
    Walnuts, May 31, 2007
    #9