Vikings Don't Have A Long-Term Plan For QB?

Discussion in 'Minnesota Vikings' started by 86WARD, Apr 27, 2010.

  1. 86WARD

    86WARD -

    Brad Childress seems unconcerned about what to some fans appears to be a gaping hole at quarterback if Brett Favre chooses not to return. Do the Vikings really have a long-term plan at quarterback, or is this situation so fluid that even a franchise that appears to be poised to make another Super Bowl run isn't completely sure how things will play out? At the owners meetings in late March, Childress expressed confidence in [Tavaris] Jackson and [Sage] Rosenfels and indicated that if Favre doesn't return, Jackson would have the upper hand in the battle for the starting job heading into training camp.

    Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune
     
  2. DatR3al

    DatR3al No Days Off

    every team in our division is making moves and getting better besides us
     
  3. DontKnowMe

    DontKnowMe Anti-Social Networker

    They should have made better plans for this.
     
  4. K Train

    K Train Do You Honeycutt?

    cant believe they passed on clausen at 34
     
  5. AtlantaBlazer

    AtlantaBlazer Knuckles The Echidna's Brother

    They made a mistake passing on him, I hate Clausen and am an avid T-Jack supporter, but Clausen would've been their best bet. You can't let a 40-year old guy delay you from planning for your future, at most Favre plays one more season.
     
  6. hermhater

    hermhater Guest

    Favre is eternal.
     
  7. mike oxlong

    mike oxlong The Voice Of Reason

    They are hoping for next year's group of QB's (maybe Luck). They won't finish bad enough for Locker or Mallet (that's a good thing not getting mallet anyway) if Favre comes back.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2010