Wow. That's why you should always have min-bid acquisition of 0$.
You're very Bengals heavy so I might be tempted to play Wilson just for diversity, but I'm fine with how you have it. If Eifert doesn't go, Watson is...
Hey all. I had an extended vacation but I'm back! I'll get right to your questions...
Probably go Delanie (unless you already used Riddick, in which case good job!)
I know the matchup is juicy, but I'd play both Lamar and Hill over Blue.
I might be tempted to play: Duke over Hillman Watson over Eifert Wilson over Dalton But honestly I think the way you have it is OK.
I'd probably still roll with Tannehill, although McCown is a good one-week fillin against Baltimore.
Wait for more injury news... and it also depends on who you'd have to drop.
Need more news on the KC injury situation. If West is out for any amount of time it's: Ware Allen then the rest. Otherwise switch top 2. I'd drop...
Gurley and Ivory.
If a keeper league, absolutely!
You can "hate" a trade because it helps both teams get better, but that's absolutely why the Veto power should never be used. Teams have a RIGHT to...
1) what the rest of the league thinks doesn't matter. I HATE the concept of vetoing trades UNLESS there is obvious collusion (team out of playoffs...
Thomas Rawls!
Yeah, this week whoever saved their waiver budget is blowing it all on Allen and Ware.
His victory by one point this week keeps him in the record lead. By the way my team is really, grossly good.
Yeah, they killed me in DFS - but that's why you diversify your lineups. I played 4 Winston lineups, 3 Cam, and 3 Russ Wilson. I feel kinda smart :)...
I'd handcuff in PPR and not in non-ppr. The exception is if either are dynasty/keeper, in which case I think Cobb is a solid add.
I agree with your feeling. Really hard to bench Palmer at this point, though.
QB - close, but I'd go Carr. RB - Murray and Starks, Karlos a really nice upside play WR - Adams and Watkins Flex - Karlos Carolina. Love the...
Separate names with a comma.
