ram29jackson's STONE COLD LOCK OF THE CENTURY SUPER BOWL PREDICTIONS

Yeah...right...



Shot in the dark!!

 

No, honey. Buffalo over GB was deductive reasoning. OAK over KC, SF over SEA, and CHI over NO...those were shots in the dark.

When correct = deductive reasoning.
When incorrect = shot in the dark.

 

What statement are you trying to make, sugar plum?

 

Think he's trying to say he knows how to post an image.

 

but you don't. You don't know anything...lol. You prove it week after week sweet cheeks. I don't think we've ever had such a childish imagination on this board. Your intelligence level is that of a 6 year old. Which is cool...evidently, your into that so everything is working out for you...except for your shot in the dark picks...those...not so good.

 

you truly have no critical thinking skills and are focusing on the wrong thing entirely.
Why the f--k would I pick buffalo just to get lucky ? All logic says the Pack is supposed to win so it should be twice the bullshirt that they don't and yet I deliberately picked buffalo.

LOL at calling me the child because you cant comprehend what you are learning from me. I wouldn't be this annoying if I didn't already know I was right.

when a game happens that you call an upset, I know for a fact it was premeditated for gambling reasons.

when 4 rookie QBs go with their teams to the playoffs in the same year, I know its bullcrap.

 

it must be tough going impotent.

 

You were lucky to pick Buffalo based on all your other upsets being incorrect. You pick underdogs to have some kind of bravado for your bullshirt theory.

You don't talk about how you are wrong with these upsets much more than you are right. Everyone else is correct much, much, much more than you.

If you know for a "fact" that it was premeditated for gambling purposes, show your facts. If you don't have proof, it's not a "fact". In between trying to pick-up kids, check out a dictionary.

 

That's all it is Mary...Luck. In your case...mostly not though. But like I've said a million times...shot in the dark and you're likely to hit one or two...good job.

 

If Ward was 7 or 8 years old, he and ram29jackson would be a really cute couple.

 

I'm not gay. Not that there is anything wrong with that...but it's nice to have options I guess...

 

Said every closeted gay man ever.

 

This time I mean it though.

 

Wonder why ramrod didn't pick the Redskins...seemed like an obvious storyline there...team can't beat anyone...all of a sudden the Eagles miss two FGs and then the Redskins get a turnover with 1:30 left and kick the FG for the win. Such an obvious storyline in the making...yet no one (even those that aren't childish) saw it coming...lol.

 

Mark is obviously a child.